Monday, August 8, 2022
HomeArtificial IntelligenceAI Adoption within the Enterprise 2021 – O’Reilly

AI Adoption within the Enterprise 2021 – O’Reilly


In the course of the first weeks of February, we requested recipients of our Knowledge and AI Newsletters to take part in a survey on AI adoption within the enterprise. We have been considering answering two questions. First, we needed to grasp how using AI grew prior to now yr. We have been additionally within the follow of AI: how builders work, what strategies and instruments they use, what their issues are, and what improvement practices are in place.

Probably the most hanging result’s the sheer variety of respondents. In our 2020 survey, which reached the identical viewers, we had 1,239 responses. This yr, we had a complete of 5,154. After eliminating 1,580 respondents who didn’t full the survey, we’re left with 3,574 responses—nearly 3 times as many as final yr. It’s doable that pandemic-induced boredom led extra folks to reply, however we doubt it. Whether or not they’re placing merchandise into manufacturing or simply kicking the tires, extra persons are utilizing AI than ever earlier than.




Be taught sooner. Dig deeper. See farther.


Government Abstract

  • We had nearly 3 times as many responses as final yr, with related efforts at promotion. Extra persons are working with AI.
  • Up to now, firm tradition has been essentially the most important barrier to AI adoption. Whereas it’s nonetheless a difficulty, tradition has dropped to fourth place.
  • This yr, essentially the most important barrier to AI adoption is the dearth of expert folks and the problem of hiring. That scarcity has been predicted for a number of years; we’re lastly seeing it.
  • The second-most important barrier was the supply of high quality knowledge. That realization is an indication that the sphere is rising up.
  • The proportion of respondents reporting “mature” practices has been roughly the identical for the previous few years. That isn’t stunning, given the rise within the variety of respondents: we suspect many organizations are simply starting their AI tasks.
  • The retail trade sector has the best share of mature practices; schooling has the bottom. However schooling additionally had the best share of respondents who have been “contemplating” AI.
  • Comparatively few respondents are utilizing model management for knowledge and fashions. Instruments for versioning knowledge and fashions are nonetheless immature, however they’re essential for making AI outcomes reproducible and dependable.

Respondents

Of the three,574 respondents who accomplished this yr’s survey, 3,099 have been working with AI in a roundabout way: contemplating it, evaluating it, or placing merchandise into manufacturing. Of those respondents, it’s not a shock that the most important quantity are primarily based in the US (39%) and that roughly half have been from North America (47%). India had the second-most respondents (7%), whereas Asia (together with India) had 16% of the whole. Australia and New Zealand accounted for 3% of the whole, giving the Asia-Pacific (APAC) area 19%. Somewhat over 1 / 4 (26%) of respondents have been from Europe, led by Germany (4%). 7% of the respondents have been from South America, and a couple of% have been from Africa. Apart from Antarctica, there have been no continents with zero respondents, and a complete of 111 nations have been represented. These outcomes that curiosity and use of AI is worldwide and rising.

This yr’s outcomes match final yr’s knowledge properly. Nevertheless it’s equally necessary to note what the info doesn’t say. Solely 0.2% of the respondents stated they have been from China. That clearly doesn’t mirror actuality; China is a frontrunner in AI and doubtless has extra AI builders than some other nation, together with the US. Likewise, 1% of the respondents have been from Russia. Purely as a guess, we suspect that the variety of AI builders in Russia is barely smaller than the quantity within the US. These anomalies say rather more about who the survey reached (subscribers to O’Reilly’s newsletters) than they are saying in regards to the precise variety of AI builders in Russia and China.

Determine 1. Respondents working with AI by nation (high 12)

The respondents represented a various vary of industries. Not surprisingly, computer systems, electronics, and expertise topped the charts, with 17% of the respondents. Monetary companies (15%), healthcare (9%), and schooling (8%) are the industries making the next-most important use of AI. We see comparatively little use of AI within the pharmaceutical and chemical industries (2%), although we anticipate that to vary sharply given the position of AI in creating the COVID-19 vaccine. Likewise, we see few respondents from the automotive trade (2%), although we all know that AI is vital to new merchandise equivalent to autonomous autos.

3% of the respondents have been from the vitality trade, and one other 1% from public utilities (which incorporates a part of the vitality sector). That’s a decent quantity by itself, however now we have to ask: Will AI play a job in rebuilding our frail and outdated vitality infrastructure, as occasions of the previous few years—not simply the Texas freeze or the California fires—have demonstrated? We anticipate that it’ll, although it’s honest to ask whether or not AI programs educated on normative knowledge shall be strong within the face of “black swan” occasions. What’s going to an AI system do when confronted with a uncommon state of affairs, one which isn’t well-represented in its coaching knowledge? That, in any case, is the issue going through the builders of autonomous autos. Driving a automobile safely is simple when the opposite site visitors and pedestrians all play by the foundations. It’s solely tough when one thing surprising occurs. The identical is true of {the electrical} grid.

We additionally anticipate AI to reshape agriculture (1% of respondents). As with vitality, AI-driven adjustments received’t come shortly. Nevertheless, we’ve seen a gradual stream of AI tasks in agriculture, with objectives starting from detecting crop illness to killing moths with small drones.

Lastly, 8% of respondents stated that their trade was “Different,” and 14% have been grouped into “All Others.” “All Others” combines 12 industries that the survey listed as doable responses (together with automotive, pharmaceutical and chemical, and agriculture) however that didn’t have sufficient responses to indicate within the chart. “Different” is the wild card, comprising industries we didn’t record as choices. “Different” seems within the fourth place, simply behind healthcare. Sadly, we don’t know which industries are represented by that class—nevertheless it exhibits that the unfold of AI has certainly develop into broad!

Determine 2. Industries utilizing AI

Maturity

Roughly one quarter of the respondents described their use of AI as “mature” (26%), that means that that they had revenue-bearing AI merchandise in manufacturing. That is nearly precisely in step with the outcomes from 2020, the place 25% of the respondents reported that that they had merchandise in manufacturing (“Mature” wasn’t a doable response within the 2020 survey.)

This yr, 35% of our respondents have been “evaluating” AI (trials and proof-of-concept tasks), additionally roughly the identical as final yr (33%). 13% of the respondents weren’t making use of AI or contemplating utilizing it; that is down from final yr’s quantity (15%), however once more, it’s not considerably completely different.

What can we make of the respondents who’re “contemplating” AI however haven’t but began any tasks (26%)? That’s not an choice final yr’s respondents had. We suspect that final yr respondents who have been contemplating AI stated they have been both “evaluating” or “not utilizing” it.

Determine 3. AI follow maturity

Trying on the issues respondents confronted in AI adoption gives one other solution to gauge the general maturity of AI as a discipline. Final yr, the most important bottleneck holding again adoption was firm tradition (22%), adopted by the problem of figuring out applicable use circumstances (20%). This yr, cultural issues are in fourth place (14%) and discovering applicable use circumstances is in third (17%). That’s a really important change, notably for company tradition. Firms have accepted AI to a a lot larger diploma, though discovering applicable issues to unravel nonetheless stays a problem.

The largest issues on this yr’s survey are lack of expert folks and issue in hiring (19%) and knowledge high quality (18%). It’s no shock that the demand for AI experience has exceeded the provision, nevertheless it’s necessary to understand that it’s now develop into the largest bar to wider adoption. The largest abilities gaps have been ML modelers and knowledge scientists (52%), understanding enterprise use circumstances (49%), and knowledge engineering (42%). The necessity for folks managing and sustaining computing infrastructure was comparatively low (24%), hinting that corporations are fixing their infrastructure necessities within the cloud.

It’s gratifying to notice that organizations beginning to notice the significance of knowledge high quality (18%). We’ve recognized about “rubbish in, rubbish out” for a very long time; that goes double for AI. Dangerous knowledge yields unhealthy outcomes at scale.

Hyperparameter tuning (2%) wasn’t thought of an issue. It’s on the backside of the record—the place, we hope, it belongs. That will mirror the success of automated instruments for constructing fashions (AutoML, though as we’ll see later, most respondents aren’t utilizing them). It’s extra regarding that workflow reproducibility (3%) is in second-to-last place. This is smart, provided that we don’t see heavy utilization of instruments for mannequin and knowledge versioning. We’ll have a look at this later, however having the ability to reproduce experimental outcomes is essential to any science, and it’s a well known drawback in AI.

Determine 4. Bottlenecks to AI adoption

Maturity by Continent

When trying on the geographic distribution of respondents with mature practices, we discovered nearly no distinction between North America (27%), Asia (27%), and Europe (28%). In distinction, in our 2018 report, Asia was behind in mature practices, although it had a markedly increased variety of respondents within the “early adopter” or “exploring” levels. Asia has clearly caught up. There’s no important distinction between these three continents in our 2021 knowledge.

We discovered a smaller share of respondents with mature practices and the next share of respondents who have been “contemplating” AI in South America (20%), Oceania (Australia and New Zealand, 18%), and Africa (17%). Don’t underestimate AI’s future affect on any of those continents.

Lastly, the share of respondents “evaluating” AI was nearly the identical on every continent, various solely from 31% (South America) to 36% (Oceania).

Determine 5. Maturity by continent

Maturity by Business

Whereas AI maturity doesn’t rely strongly on geography, we see a distinct image if we have a look at maturity by trade.

Trying on the high eight industries, monetary companies (38%), telecommunications (37%), and retail (40%) had the best share of respondents reporting mature practices. And whereas it had by far the best variety of respondents, computer systems, electronics, and expertise was in fourth place, with 35% of respondents reporting mature practices. Training (10%) and authorities (16%) have been the laggards. Healthcare and life sciences, at 28%, have been within the center, as have been manufacturing (25%), protection (26%), and media (29%).

However, if we have a look at industries which might be contemplating AI, we discover that schooling is the chief (48%). Respondents working in authorities and manufacturing appear to be considerably additional alongside, with 49% and 47% evaluating AI, that means that they’ve pilot or proof-of-concept tasks in progress.

This may increasingly simply be a trick of the numbers: each group provides as much as 100%, so if there are fewer “mature” practices in a single group, the share of “evaluating” and “contemplating” practices must be increased. However there’s additionally an actual sign: respondents in these industries could not think about their practices “mature,” however every of those trade sectors had over 100 respondents, and schooling had nearly 250. Manufacturing must automate many processes (from meeting to inspection and extra); authorities has been as challenged as any trade by the worldwide pandemic, and has all the time wanted methods to “do extra with much less”; and schooling has been experimenting with expertise for a lot of years now. There’s a actual want to do extra with AI in these fields. It’s value declaring that instructional and governmental purposes of AI often increase moral questions—and one of the necessary points for the following few years shall be seeing how these organizations reply to moral issues.

Determine 6. Maturity by trade (p.c)

The Apply of AI

Now that we’ve mentioned the place mature practices are discovered, each geographically and by trade, let’s see what a mature follow appears like. What do these organizations have in frequent? How are they completely different from organizations which might be evaluating or contemplating AI?

Strategies

First, 82% of the respondents are utilizing supervised studying, and 67% are utilizing deep studying. Deep studying is a set of algorithms which might be frequent to nearly all AI approaches, so this overlap isn’t stunning. (Individuals might present a number of solutions.) 58% claimed to be utilizing unsupervised studying.

After unsupervised studying, there was a major drop-off. Human-in-the-loop, information graphs, reinforcement studying, simulation, and planning and reasoning all noticed utilization beneath 40%. Surprisingly, pure language processing wasn’t within the image in any respect. (A really small variety of respondents wrote in “pure language processing” as a response, however they have been solely a small share of the whole.) That is important and undoubtedly value watching over the following few months. In the previous few years, there have been many breakthroughs in NLP and NLU (pure language understanding): everybody within the trade has examine GPT-3, and lots of distributors are betting closely on utilizing AI to automate customer support name facilities and related purposes. This survey means that these purposes nonetheless haven’t moved into follow.

We requested an identical query to respondents who have been contemplating or evaluating using AI (60% of the whole). Whereas the odds have been decrease, the applied sciences appeared in the identical order, with only a few variations. This means that respondents who’re nonetheless evaluating AI are experimenting with fewer applied sciences than respondents with mature practices. That implies (fairly sufficient) that respondents are selecting to “begin easy” and restrict the strategies that they experiment with.

Determine 7. AI applied sciences utilized in mature practices

Knowledge

We additionally requested what sorts of knowledge our “mature” respondents are utilizing. Most (83%) are utilizing structured knowledge (logfiles, time sequence knowledge, geospatial knowledge). 71% are utilizing textual content knowledge—that isn’t per the variety of respondents who reported utilizing NLP, until “textual content” is getting used generically to incorporate any knowledge that may be represented as textual content (e.g., kind knowledge). 52% of the respondents reported utilizing pictures and video. That appears low relative to the quantity of analysis we examine AI and pc imaginative and prescient. Maybe it’s not stunning although: there’s no purpose for enterprise use circumstances to be in sync with educational analysis. We’d anticipate most enterprise purposes to contain structured knowledge, kind knowledge, or textual content knowledge of some variety. Comparatively few respondents (23%) are working with audio, which stays very difficult.

Once more, we requested an identical query to respondents who have been evaluating or contemplating AI, and once more, we obtained related outcomes, although the share of respondents for any given reply was considerably smaller (4–5%).

Determine 8. Knowledge sorts utilized in mature practices

Danger

After we requested respondents with mature practices what dangers they checked for, 71% stated “surprising outcomes or predictions.” Interpretability, mannequin degradation over time, privateness, and equity additionally ranked excessive (over 50%), although it’s disappointing that solely 52% of the respondents chosen this feature. Safety can also be a priority, at 42%. AI raises necessary new safety points, together with the potential of poisoned knowledge sources and reverse engineering fashions to extract personal data.

It’s arduous to interpret these outcomes with out understanding precisely what purposes are being developed. Privateness, safety, equity, and security are necessary issues for each utility of AI, nevertheless it’s additionally necessary to understand that not all purposes are the identical. A farming utility that detects crop illness doesn’t have the identical type of dangers as an utility that’s approving or denying loans. Security is a a lot larger concern for autonomous autos than for customized purchasing bots. Nevertheless, do we actually consider that these dangers don’t have to be addressed for almost half of all tasks?

Determine 9. Dangers checked for throughout improvement

Instruments

Respondents with mature practices clearly had their favourite instruments: scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Keras every scored over 45%, with scikit-learn and TensorFlow the leaders (each with 65%). A second group of instruments, together with Amazon’s SageMaker (25%), Microsoft’s Azure ML Studio (21%), and Google’s Cloud ML Engine (18%), clustered round 20%, together with Spark NLP and spaCy.

When requested which instruments they deliberate to include over the approaching 12 months, roughly half of the respondents answered mannequin monitoring (57%) and mannequin visualization (49%). Fashions develop into stale for a lot of causes, not the least of which is adjustments in human habits, adjustments for which the mannequin itself could also be accountable. The flexibility to observe a mannequin’s efficiency and detect when it has develop into “stale” shall be more and more necessary as companies develop extra reliant on AI and in flip demand that AI tasks exhibit their worth.

Determine 10. Instruments utilized by mature practices

Responses from those that have been evaluating or contemplating AI have been related, however with some attention-grabbing variations: scikit-learn moved from first place to 3rd (48%). The second group was led by merchandise from cloud distributors that incorporate AutoML: Microsoft Azure ML Studio (29%), Google Cloud ML Engine (25%), and Amazon SageMaker (23%). These merchandise have been considerably extra fashionable than they have been amongst “mature” customers. The distinction isn’t enormous, however it’s hanging. Vulnerable to over-overinterpreting, customers who’re newer to AI are extra inclined to make use of vendor-specific packages, extra inclined to make use of AutoML in considered one of its incarnations, and considerably extra inclined to go together with Microsoft or Google quite than Amazon. It’s additionally doable that scikit-learn has much less model recognition amongst those that are comparatively new to AI in comparison with packages from organizations like Google or Fb.

When requested particularly about AutoML merchandise, 51% of “mature” respondents stated they weren’t utilizing AutoML in any respect. 22% use Amazon SageMaker; 16% use Microsoft Azure AutoML; 14% use Google Cloud AutoML; and different instruments have been all underneath 10%. Amongst customers who’re evaluating or contemplating AI, solely 40% stated they weren’t utilizing AutoML in any respect—and the Google, Microsoft, and Amazon packages have been all however tied (27–28%). AutoML isn’t but an enormous a part of the image, nevertheless it seems to be gaining traction amongst customers who’re nonetheless contemplating or experimenting with AI. And it’s doable that we’ll see elevated use of AutoML instruments amongst mature customers, of whom 45% indicated that they’d be incorporating instruments for automated mannequin search and hyperparameter tuning (in a phrase, AutoML) within the coming but.

Deployment and Monitoring

An AI mission means nothing if it may possibly’t be deployed; even tasks which might be solely supposed for inside use want some type of deployment. Our survey confirmed that AI deployment remains to be largely unknown territory, dominated by homegrown advert hoc processes. The three most vital instruments for deploying AI all had roughly 20% adoption: MLflow (22%), TensorFlow Prolonged, a.ok.a. TFX (20%), and Kubeflow (18%). Three merchandise from smaller startups—Domino, Seldon, and Cortex—had roughly 4% adoption. However essentially the most frequent reply to this query was “not one of the above” (46%). Since this query was solely requested of respondents with “mature” AI practices (i.e., respondents who’ve AI merchandise in manufacturing), we will solely assume that they’ve constructed their very own instruments and pipelines for deployment and monitoring. Given the various varieties that an AI mission can take, and that AI deployment remains to be one thing of a darkish artwork, it isn’t stunning that AI builders and operations groups are solely beginning to undertake third-party instruments for deployment.

Determine 11. Automated instruments utilized in mature practices for deployment
and monitoring

Versioning

Supply management has lengthy been an ordinary follow in software program improvement. There are a lot of well-known instruments used to construct supply code repositories.

We’re assured that AI tasks use supply code repositories equivalent to Git or GitHub; that’s an ordinary follow for all software program builders. Nevertheless, AI brings with it a distinct set of issues. In AI programs, the coaching knowledge is as necessary as, if no more necessary than, the supply code. So is the mannequin constructed from the coaching knowledge: the mannequin displays the coaching knowledge and hyperparameters, along with the supply code itself, and could also be the results of a whole bunch of experiments.

Our survey exhibits that AI builders are solely beginning to use instruments for knowledge and mannequin versioning. For knowledge versioning, 35% of the respondents are utilizing homegrown instruments, whereas 46% responded “not one of the above,” which we take to imply they’re utilizing nothing greater than a database. 9% are utilizing DVC, 8% are utilizing instruments from Weights & Biases, and 5% are utilizing Pachyderm.

Determine 12. Automated instruments used for knowledge versioning

Instruments for mannequin and experiment monitoring have been used extra often, though the outcomes are basically the identical. 29% are utilizing homegrown instruments, whereas 34% stated “not one of the above.” The main instruments have been MLflow (27%) and Kubeflow (18%), with Weights & Biases at 8%.

Determine 13. Automated instruments used for mannequin and experiment monitoring

Respondents who’re contemplating or evaluating AI are even much less possible to make use of knowledge versioning instruments: 59% stated “not one of the above,” whereas solely 26% are utilizing homegrown instruments. Weights & Biases was the preferred third-party resolution (12%). When requested about mannequin and experiment monitoring, 44% stated “not one of the above,” whereas 21% are utilizing homegrown instruments. It’s attention-grabbing, although, that on this group, MLflow (25%) and Kubeflow (21%) ranked above homegrown instruments.

Though the instruments accessible for versioning fashions and knowledge are nonetheless rudimentary, it’s disturbing that so many practices, together with people who have AI merchandise in manufacturing, aren’t utilizing them. You may’t reproduce outcomes for those who can’t reproduce the info and the fashions that generated the outcomes. We’ve stated {that a} quarter of respondents thought of their AI follow mature—nevertheless it’s unclear what maturity means if it doesn’t embody reproducibility.

The Backside Line

Up to now two years, the viewers for AI has grown, nevertheless it hasn’t modified a lot: Roughly the identical share of respondents think about themselves to be a part of a “mature” follow; the identical industries are represented, and at roughly the identical ranges; and the geographical distribution of our respondents has modified little.

We don’t know whether or not to be gratified or discouraged that solely 50% of the respondents listed privateness or ethics as a threat they have been involved about. With out knowledge from prior years, it’s arduous to inform whether or not that is an enchancment or a step backward. Nevertheless it’s tough to consider that there are such a lot of AI purposes for which privateness, ethics, and safety aren’t important dangers.

Device utilization didn’t current any large surprises: the sphere is dominated by scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Keras, although there’s a wholesome ecosystem of open supply, commercially licensed, and cloud native instruments. AutoML has but to make large inroads, however respondents representing much less mature practices appear to be leaning towards automated instruments and are much less possible to make use of scikit-learn.

The variety of respondents who aren’t addressing knowledge or mannequin versioning was an unwelcome shock. These practices needs to be foundational: central to creating AI merchandise which have verifiable, repeatable outcomes. Whereas we acknowledge that versioning instruments applicable to AI purposes are nonetheless of their early levels, the variety of individuals who checked “not one of the above” was revealing—notably since “the above” included homegrown instruments. You may’t have reproducible outcomes for those who don’t have reproducible knowledge and fashions. Interval.

Up to now yr, AI within the enterprise has grown; the sheer variety of respondents will let you know that. However has it matured? Many new groups are coming into the sphere, whereas the share of respondents who’ve deployed purposes has remained roughly fixed. In lots of respects, this means success: 25% of an even bigger quantity is greater than 25% of a smaller quantity. However is utility deployment the correct metric for maturity? Enterprise AI received’t actually have matured till improvement and operations teams can interact in practices like steady deployment, till outcomes are repeatable (not less than in a statistical sense), and till ethics, security, privateness, and safety are main quite than secondary issues. Mature AI? Sure, enterprise AI has been maturing. Nevertheless it’s time to set the bar for maturity increased.



RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular